Home / The Leadership Library / Crisis and Change

Crisis and Change

Leading through disruption. What holds when conditions break, how confidence is kept, and how organizations are steadied and remade.

Chapter contents

Entries filed directly to this chapter

  1. 01

    Sequencing

    The same set of changes succeeds or fails depending on the order. Sequence determines who has to move before the evidence arrives, and that is the whole difficulty.

  2. 02

    Changing What You Should Have Left Alone

    Some inefficiencies are load-bearing. A practice with no visible purpose has usually survived because it was solving something, and the cost of removing it appears months later in an unrelated place.

  3. 03

    The Announcement Fallacy

    Communicating a change is not making one. The announcement is the cheapest part and it feels like the hardest, which is why leaders reliably mistake it for completion.

  4. 04

    Change Fatigue

    The fifth initiative fails on arrival because of what happened to the first four. People are not tired of change; they have learned that waiting is the winning strategy.

  5. 05

    Resistance Is Usually Information

    Most of what gets labelled resistance is an accurate objection from somebody closer to the work. The label is attractive because it converts a substantive problem into a personnel matter.

  6. 06

    The Month-Four Collapse

    Every change programme has a point where the initial energy is spent and the results have not arrived. It is predictable, it is survivable, and almost nobody plans for it.

  7. 07

    What Organizations Actually Learn

    Findings that require a permanent change in somebody's behaviour do not survive. Findings encoded into a form, a threshold, or a scheduled event survive without anybody remembering why.

  8. 08

    Rebuilding Trust

    Trust returns through accumulated small instances of doing what you said, on a timeline you do not control. Announcements do not accelerate it and reliably set it back.

  9. 09

    Accountability Without Scapegoating

    Locating a person ends the inquiry, which is precisely what makes it attractive. The test is whether a competent replacement in the same system would have produced the same outcome.

  10. 10

    The After-Action Review

    Ninety minutes, held within three weeks, run by somebody who is not the senior person. Reconstruct the timeline before anybody explains anything, and produce three fixes rather than fourteen recommendations.